IS enough being done in schools to promote
sports?
There
are 7,772 primary schools and 2,408 secondary schools for a total of 10,180 in
the country.
The
breakdown of enrolment is as follows:
•
Pre-schools — 200,684
•
Primary schools — 2,685,403
•
Secondary schools — 2,188,525
The
total enrolment is 5,074,612 or about 16 per cent of the population of
30,751,602.
Of
the 10,180 schools — 128 are “high performance” and 225 are “cluster”.
The
Cluster School of Excellence are those that have distinguished themselves by
attaining excellence in their cluster — in all aspects of the school management
and student achievement.
High
performance schools are defined as schools that have ethos, character and a
unique identity in all aspects of education.
They
have a tradition of high performance work culture that develops national human
capital in a holistic and sustainable manner and are competitive in the
international arena.
Then
there are Sports Schools — Bukit Jalil and Bandar Penawar in Kota Tinggi, Johor
— which have an intake about 550 each.
From
the aspects of management and administration, the schools follow the concept of
fully residential school which is equipped with sports and academic facilities.
Bukit
Jalil Sports School was opened in 1996. Its success in producing athletes for
the 1998 Commonwealth Games led to Bandar Penawar Sports School that same year.
The
government will build another three sports schools under the 9th Malaysia Plan
in Pahang, Sabah and Perlis.
The
ratio between schools and students against students who specialise in sports is
far from desired.
The
National Sports Policy in schools is divided to sports for excellence and
sports for all.
Sports
for excellence comprise of national schools sports competition, sports schools
and high performance sports, whereas sports for all under physical education
and health, co-curricular and schools sports activities.
The
problem is a majority of schools have fields either in deplorable conditions,
reduced to minimum sizes or too small. Some do not even have fields!
In
2011, Education Ministry (MOE) began the “1 student 1 sport” policy. All
students were to be involved in at least one sport.
The
problem is students don’t get to pick the sports but are channelled to the
various sports by teachers.
But
there are not enough qualified teachers to coach?
Among
the development programme are cross-country, standard test and sports day. Who
monitors them?
There
are tournaments like the Minister of Education League — a national level
football competition, but it is only for a select few.
What
we need is mass participation over a period of time — not carnival tournaments
— to spot talent.
Under
the high performance schools, 2,061 coaches and 37,339 athletes are involved in
860 district training centres which involves eight core sports — football, hockey,
gymnastics (artistic and rhythmic), sepak takraw, athletics, archery, bowling
and badminton.
Then,
there are development programmes in the form of league and circuit for
football, athletics, hockey and netball. These involve only 1,425 students.
The
cream of potential athletes for the future surface from the Malaysian School
Sports Council (MMSM) sports calendar which involves 24 sports.
It
involves Under-12, Under-15 and Under-18 boys and girls where 805,088 compete
at district level, 100,636 at State level and 12,154 at national level.
Top
athletes from MSSM competition are then selected to represent the nation at
Asean, Southeast Asian, Asian and world age group tournaments.
But
for these competitions the bulk of athletes come from the two sports schools.
Talent
identification and development (TID) programme is another source of fresh
athletes surfacing.
TID
programmes are conducted at district, state and national level which involves
12 sports where national sports associations (NSA) are involved in the
selection of students to be placed in state and national sports schools.
However,
the effectiveness depends of the strength of the NSAs and their involvement at
grassroots level.
Only
2,000 students are involved at national level.
MOE
and MSSM are trying their best have an effective development programme to
provide opportunities for all students to participate in sports and training
modules for teachers.
MOE
need the cooperation of the state and national associations.
There
are some associations who work closely with them but it has to be more than
that.
These
associations have to work hand in hand with schools.
Malaysian
Golf Association, FA of Malaysia, Malaysian Rugby Union, BA of Malaysia,
Malaysian Tenpin Bowling Congress, Malaysian Athletics Federation, Squash
Racquets Association of Malaysia, Malaysian Gymnastics Federation, Malaysian
Hockey Confederation and Malaysian Basketball Association have good working
relationships with MOE.
However,
more can be done for programmes to be more effective.
MOE
alone certainly cannot be held responsible for shortcomings, if not enough
talent is not coming through from the grassroots.
TONY is a sports journalist with close to four
decades of experience and is passionate about local sports.
He can be reached at
tmariadass@gmail.com
tmariadass@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment